John R. McRæ / University of California Press / 2004年01月19日
《Seeing through Zen》一书由John R. McRæ所著,深入探索了中国禅佛教中的相遇、转变与宗谱。书中详细阐述了禅佛教的传统,这一传统更为人们所熟知的名字是禅宗。作者通过本书揭示了禅宗不仅仅是浪漫化的冥想和超脱,而是一个历史悠久、内涵丰富的宗教实践体系。读者将跟随作者的笔触,了解禅宗如何在历史长河中不断发展与变革,以及它如何与其他文化、思想流派相互影响,形成了独特的宗谱。本书对于希望深入了解禅宗及其在中国文化中地位的读者来说,是一部不可多得的佳作。
可滚动、双指缩放查看
1. Introduction
Key Points:
The book aims to explore the genealogy of Chan (Zen) Buddhism in China with a critical eye.
It delves into the encounters between Chan masters and their students, as well as transformation within the tradition.
The author questions the authenticity and historical accuracy of some popular Chan Buddhist narratives.
2. The Encounter Between Chan Masters and Students
Section 1: Chan as Encounter
Chan is characterized by direct interactions between masters and students.
These encounters are informal and spontaneous, often without scripted teachings.
The master's role is to provoke awakening in the student through various methods.
Section 2: The Role of Language in Chan Encounters
Chan teaching often involves paradoxical statements and koans (mysterious sayings).
The use of language in Chan is intended to transcend ordinary understanding.
Silence can also be an important part of the teaching process.
3. Transformation Within the Chan Tradition
Section 1: The Historical Development of Chan
The book traces the evolution of Chan from its beginnings to the late imperial period.
It examines how different schools of Chan emerged and developed over time.
The author highlights the influence of politics and society on the shaping of Chan.
Section 2: Chan Lineages and transmissions
Chan tradition emphasizes the transmission of insight from master to student.
The book explores the significance of lineage and the idea of an unbroken chain of transmission.
It critiques the authenticity claims made by certain lineages and figures.
4. Genealogy and Authenticity in Chan Buddhism
Key Points:
The genealogical approach employed in the book challenges traditional Chan historiography.
It delves into the construction of Chan identity and authority over the centuries.
The author suggests that Chan's history is more complex and diverse than previously presented.
Conclusion
Key Points:
The book ends with a reflection on the importance of questioning and skepticism in the study of Chan.
It calls for a more nuanced and critical understanding of the tradition's history and teachings.
The author encourages a broader perspective that incorporates different voices and interpretive frameworks.